The Pharmacologic Management of Cardiac Arrest.

The effectiveness of pharmacologic management of cardiac arrest patients is widely debated; however, several studies published in the past 5 years have begun to clarify some of these issues. This article covers the current state of evidence for the effectiveness of the vasopressor epinephrine and the combination of vasopressin-steroids-epinephrine and antiarrhythmic medications amiodarone and lidocaine and reviews the role of other medications such as calcium, sodium bicarbonate, magnesium, and atropine in cardiac arrest care. We additionally review the role of ß-blockers for refractory pulseless ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation and thrombolytics in undifferentiated cardiac arrest and suspected fatal pulmonary embolism.

Microfluidic production of amiodarone loaded nanoparticles and application in drug repositioning in ovarian cancer.

Amiodarone repositioning in cancer treatment is promising, however toxicity limits seem to arise, constraining its exploitability. Notably, amiodarone has been investigated for the treatment of ovarian cancer, a tumour known for metastasizing within the peritoneal cavity. This is associated with an increase of fatty acid oxidation, which strongly depends on CPT1A, a transport protein which has been found overexpressed in ovarian cancer. Amiodarone is an inhibitor of CPT1A but its role still has to be explored. Therefore, in the present study, amiodarone was tested on ovarian cancer cell lines with a focus on lipid alteration, confirming its activity. Moreover, considering that drug delivery systems could lower drug side effects, microfluidics was employed for the development of drug delivery systems of amiodarone obtaining simultaneously liposomes with a high payload and amiodarone particles. Prior to amiodarone loading, microfluidics production was optimized in term of temperature and flow rate ratio. Moreover, stability over time of particles was evaluated. In vitro tests confirmed the efficacy of the drug delivery systems.

Ivabradine for congenital ectopic tachycardia in newborn.

INTRODUCTION: Congenital junctional ectopic tachycardia is a rare arrhythmia that occurs in patients without previous cardiac surgery. In this report, we wanted to present a 6-hour-old newborn with congenital junctional ectopic tachycardia resistant to conventional anti-arrhythmic medications, who was successfully treated with ivabradine and amiadarone combination. CASE: A six-hour-old newborn girl was hospitalised in neonatal ICU because transient tachypnoea of the newborn. She was tachycardic, and supraventricular tachycardia was noticed. There was no answer to the adenosine esmolol treatment; even synchronised direct cardioversion intravenous amiodarone was started. Junctional ectopic tachycardia was diagnosed. We have added propranolol to the treatment and followed patient for 2 days. On the fourth day, junctional ectopic tachycardia rhythm still persisted; therefore, ivabradine treatment was added to the treatment. On the following day, the heart rhythm was slowed to 110/min, and propranolol was stopped; intravenous amiodarone treatment was changed to the oral form. The rhythm turned into sinus; two days after starting ivabradine and oral amiodarone. CONCLUSION: Tachyarrhythmia originating in the atrioventricular node and atrioventricular junction including the bundle of His complex are junctional ectopic tachycardia. Congenital junctional ectopic tachycardia is rare, and it is mostly resistant to the conventional treatment.Ivabradine is a new anti-arrhythmic agent, used extensively to decrease sinus rate in the treatment of cardiac failure. Ivabradine may be an option for the resistant congenital ectopic tachycardia.

Prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation in cardiac surgery: a quality improvement project.

PURPOSE: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) has an incidence of 20-60% in cardiac surgery. The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists and the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology Practice Advisory have recommended postoperative beta blockers and amiodarone for the prevention of POAF. By employing quality improvement (QI) strategies, we sought to increase the use of these agents and to reduce the incidence of POAF among our patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: This single-centre QI initiative followed the traditional Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) cycle scientific methodology. A POAF risk score was developed to categorize all patients undergoing cardiac surgery as either normal or elevated risk. Risk stratification was incorporated into a preprinted prescribing guide, which recommended postoperative beta blockade for all patients and a postoperative amiodarone protocol for patients with elevated risk starting on postoperative day one (POD1). A longitudinal audit of all patients undergoing cardiac surgery was conducted over 11 months to track the use of prophylactic medications and the incidence of POAF. RESULTS: Five hundred and sixty patients undergoing surgery were included in the QI initiative from 1 December 2020 to 1 November 2021. The baseline rate of POAF across all surgical subtypes was 39% (198/560). The use of prophylactic amiodarone in high-risk patients increased from 13% (1/8) at the start of the project to 41% (48/116) at the end of the audit period. The percentage of patients receiving a beta blocker on POD1 did fluctuate, but remained essentially unchanged throughout the audit (34.8% in December 2020 vs 46.7% in October 2021). After 11 months, the overall incidence of POAF was 29% (24.9% relative reduction). Notable reductions in the incidence of POAF were observed in more complex surgical subtypes by the end of the audit, including multiple valve replacement (89% vs 56%), aortic repair (50% vs 33%), and mitral valve surgery (45% vs 33%). CONCLUSIONS: This single-centre QI intervention increased the use of prophylactic amiodarone by 28% for patients at elevated risk of POAF, with no change in the early postoperative initiation of beta blockers (46.7% of patients by POD1). There was a notable reduction in the incidence of POAF in patients at elevated risk undergoing surgery.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Il y a une incidence de 20 à 60 % de fibrillation auriculaire postopératoire (FAPO) en chirurgie cardiaque. Dans un avis de pratique, la Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists et l'European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology ont recommandé l'utilisation de bêtabloquants et d'amiodarone en postopératoire pour la prévention du FAPO. En employant des stratégies d'amélioration de la qualité (AQ), nous avons cherché à augmenter l'utilisation de ces agents et à réduire l'incidence de FAPO chez nos patient·es bénéficiant d'une chirurgie cardiaque. MéTHODE: Cette initiative d'AQ monocentrique a suivi la méthodologie scientifique traditionnelle du cycle Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA), soit Planifier, Réaliser, Étudier, Agir. Un score de risque de FAPO a été mis au point pour catégoriser toute la patientèle bénéficiant d'une chirurgie cardiaque comme présentant un risque normal ou élevé. La stratification du risque a été intégrée dans un guide de prescription préimprimé, qui recommandait des bêtabloquants en période postopératoire pour tou·tes les patient·es et un protocole postopératoire d'amiodarone pour celles et ceux présentant un risque élevé et débutant à partir du premier jour postopératoire (JPO1). Une vérification longitudinale de toute la patientèle bénéficiant d'une chirurgie cardiaque a été menée sur une période de 11 mois afin de suivre l'utilisation de médicaments prophylactiques et l'incidence de FAPO. RéSULTATS: Cinq cent soixante personnes opérées ont été incluses dans l'initiative d'AQ entre le 1er décembre 2020 et le 1er novembre 2021. Le taux initial de FAPO pour tous les sous-types chirurgicaux était de 39 % (198/560). L'utilisation d'amiodarone prophylactique chez les patient·es à risque élevé est passée de 13 % (1/8) au début du projet à 41 % (48/116) à la fin de la période de vérification. Le pourcentage de patient·es recevant un bêtabloquant au JPO1 a fluctué, mais est resté fondamentalement inchangé tout au long de la période de vérification (34,8 % en décembre 2020 vs 46,7 % en octobre 2021). Après 11 mois, l'incidence globale de FAPO était de 29 % (réduction relative de 24,9 %). Des réductions notables de l'incidence de FAPO ont été observées dans des sous-types chirurgicaux plus complexes à la fin de la vérification, y compris le remplacement de plusieurs valves (89 % vs 56 %), la réparation aortique (50 % vs 33 %) et la chirurgie valvulaire mitrale (45 % vs 33 %). CONCLUSION: Cette intervention monocentrique d'amélioration de la qualité a augmenté l'utilisation de l'amiodarone prophylactique de 28 % chez les patient·es présentant un risque élevé de FAPO, sans changement dans l'amorce postopératoire précoce des bêtabloquants (46,7 % des patient·es au JPO1). Il y a eu une réduction notable de l'incidence de FAPO chez les patient·es à risque élevé bénéficiant d'une intervention chirurgicale.

Role of magnesium alone or in combination with diltiazem and/or amiodarone in prevention of atrial fibrillation following off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Objectives: In this study the authors have tried to examine the role of magnesium alone or in combination with diltiazem and / or amiodarone in prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF) following off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Background: AF after CABG is common and contributes to morbidity and mortality. Various pharmacological preventive measures including magnesium, amiodarone, diltiazem, and combination therapy among others have been tried to lower the incidence of AF. Most of the studies have been performed in patients undergoing conventional on-pump CABG. In this uncontrolled trial, efficacy of magnesium alone or in combination with amiodarone and / or diltiazem has been studied in patients undergoing off-pump CABG. Methods: One hundred and fifty patients undergoing off-pump CABG were divided into 3 groups, Group M (n=21) received intraoperative magnesium infusion at 30mg/ kg over 1 hour after midline sternotomy; Group MD (n=78) received magnesium infusion in similar manner with diltiazem infusion at 0.05 µg/kg/hr throughout the intraoperative period; Group AMD (n=51) received preoperative oral amiodarone at a dose of 200 mg three times a day for 3 days followed by 200 mg twice daily for another 3 days followed by 200 mg once daily till the day of surgery along with magnesium and diltiazem infusion as in other groups. AF lasting more than 10 min or requiring medical intervention was considered as AF. Results: The overall incidence of postoperative AF was 12.6% with 11.7% in group AMD, 19% in group M, and 11.5% in group MD, which was not statistically significant. Conclusions: It is concluded that the use of amiodarone and/or diltiazem in addition to magnesium did not result in additional benefit of lowering the incidence of AF.

Amiodarone prevents wave front-tail interactions in patients with heart failure: an in silico study.

Amiodarone (AM) is an antiarrhythmic drug whose chronic use has proved effective in preventing ventricular arrhythmias in a variety of patient populations, including those with heart failure (HF). AM has both class III [i.e., it prolongs the action potential duration (APD) via blocking potassium channels) and class I (i.e., it affects the rapid sodium channel) properties; however, the specific mechanism(s) by which it prevents reentry formation in patients with HF remains unknown. We tested the hypothesis that AM prevents reentry induction in HF during programmed electrical stimulation (PES) via its ability to induce postrepolarization refractoriness (PRR) via its class I effects on sodium channels. Here we extend our previous human action potential model to represent the effects of both HF and AM separately by calibrating to human tissue and clinical PES data, respectively. We then combine these models (HF + AM) to test our hypothesis. Results from simulations in cells and cables suggest that AM acts to increase PRR and decrease the elevation of takeoff potential. The ability of AM to prevent reentry was studied in silico in two-dimensional sheets in which a variety of APD gradients (ΔAPD) were imposed. Reentrant activity was induced in all HF simulations but was prevented in 23 of 24 HF + AM models. Eliminating the AM-induced slowing of the recovery of inactivation of the sodium channel restored the ability to induce reentry. In conclusion, in silico testing suggests that chronic AM treatment prevents reentry induction in patients with HF during PES via its class I effect to induce PRR.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This work presents a new model of the action potential of the human, which reproduces the complex dynamics during premature stimulation in heart failure patients with and without amiodarone. A specific mechanism of the ability of amiodarone to prevent reentrant arrhythmias is presented.

Propafenone versus amiodarone for supraventricular arrhythmias in septic shock: a randomised controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Acute onset supraventricular arrhythmias can contribute to haemodynamic compromise in septic shock. Both amiodarone and propafenone are available interventions, but their clinical effects have not yet been directly compared. METHODS: In this two-centre, prospective controlled parallel group double blind trial we recruited 209 septic shock patients with new-onset arrhythmia and a left ventricular ejection fraction above 35%. The patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either intravenous propafenone (70 mg bolus followed by 400-840 mg/24 h) or amiodarone (300 mg bolus followed by 600-1800 mg/24 h). The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients who had sinus rhythm 24 h after the start of the infusion, time to restoration of the first sinus rhythm and the proportion of patients with arrhythmia recurrence. RESULTS: Out of 209 randomized patients, 200 (96%) received the study drug. After 24 h, 77 (72.8%) and 71 (67.3%) were in sinus rhythm (p = 0.4), restored after a median of 3.7 h (95% CI 2.3-6.8) and 7.3 h (95% CI 5-11), p = 0.02, with propafenone and amiodarone, respectively. The arrhythmia recurred in 54 (52%) patients treated with propafenone and in 80 (76%) with amiodarone, p < 0.001. Patients with a dilated left atrium had better rhythm control with amiodarone (6.4 h (95% CI 3.5; 14.1) until cardioversion vs 18 h (95% CI 2.8; 24.7) in propafenone, p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Propafenone does not provide better rhythm control at 24 h yet offers faster cardioversion with fewer arrhythmia recurrences than with amiodarone, especially in patients with a non-dilated left atrium. No differences between propafenone and amiodarone on the prespecified short- and long-term outcomes were observed.

Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Amiodarone and Warfarin Use.

INTRODUCTION: The association between amiodarone treatment for postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and both the return to normal sinus rhythm (NSR) and anticoagulation use at discharge has not been extensively studied. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all patients who underwent biological SAVR with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center (2005-2015). We reviewed new-onset POAF, amiodarone use, return to NSR, and anticoagulation use with warfarin. Discharge rhythm and warfarin administration were compared among patients with POAF who were treated with amiodarone and patients who did not receive amiodarone. RESULTS: Of the 395 patients (186 AVR/coronary artery bypass grafting; 209 AVR) studied, POAF developed in 191 patients (48.0%); 80.1% (153/191) of these patients received amiodarone. Among patients treated with amiodarone, 70.6% (108/153) were in SR at the time of discharge versus 65.8% (25/38) of POAF patients who were not treated with amiodarone (P = 0.57). Among amiodarone-treated patients, 30.7% (47/153) were discharged with warfarin; among patients not treated with amiodarone, 31.6% (12/38) were discharged with warfarin (P = 0.92). Among amiodarone-treated patients discharged in NSR, 89.9% (97/108 patients) were not discharged with warfarin; among patients not treated with amiodarone who were discharged in NSR, 92% (23/25) were not discharged with warfarin (P = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: POAF after SAVR appears common. Although amiodarone is often used for POAF patients, its use does not appear to be associated with surgeons' decision to anticoagulate patients. Surgeons' preferences for using rhythm control and antithrombotic therapy for POAF after SAVR warrant further exploration.

Influence of medications on thyroid function in dogs: An update.

Erroneous thyroid function test results can occur because of drugs that alter thyroid hormone physiology in one or more aspects, including synthesis, secretion, distribution, and metabolism. Research since publication of the last review in the Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine (JVIM) 20 years ago has evaluated the effects of amiodarone, zonisamide, inhalant anesthetics, clomipramine, trilostane, and toceranib on thyroid function tests in the dog. In addition, recent work on the effects of glucocorticoids, sulfonamides, phenobarbital, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs will be reviewed. Awareness of these effects is necessary to avoid misdiagnosis of hypothyroidism and unnecessary treatment.

What determines the optimal pharmacological treatment of atrial fibrillation? Insights from in silico trials in 800 virtual atria.

The best pharmacological treatment for each atrial fibrillation (AF) patient is unclear. We aim to exploit AF simulations in 800 virtual atria to identify key patient characteristics that guide the optimal selection of anti-arrhythmic drugs. The virtual cohort considered variability in electrophysiology and low voltage areas (LVA) and was developed and validated against experimental and clinical data from ionic currents to ECG. AF sustained in 494 (62%) atria, with large inward rectifier K+ current (IK1 ) and Na+ /K+ pump (INaK ) densities (IK1 0.11 ± 0.03 vs. 0.07 ± 0.03 S mF-1 ; INaK 0.68 ± 0.15 vs. 0.38 ± 26 S mF-1 ; sustained vs. un-sustained AF). In severely remodelled left atrium, with LVA extensions of more than 40% in the posterior wall, higher IK1 (median density 0.12 ± 0.02 S mF-1 ) was required for AF maintenance, and rotors localized in healthy right atrium. For lower LVA extensions, rotors could also anchor to LVA, in atria presenting short refractoriness (median L-type Ca2+ current, ICaL , density 0.08 ± 0.03 S mF-1 ). This atrial refractoriness, modulated by ICaL and fast Na+ current (INa ), determined pharmacological treatment success for both small and large LVA. Vernakalant was effective in atria presenting long refractoriness (median ICaL density 0.13 ± 0.05 S mF-1 ). For short refractoriness, atria with high INa (median density 8.92 ± 2.59 S mF-1 ) responded more favourably to amiodarone than flecainide, and the opposite was found in atria with low INa (median density 5.33 ± 1.41 S mF-1 ). In silico drug trials in 800 human atria identify inward currents as critical for optimal stratification of AF patient to pharmacological treatment and, together with the left atrial LVA extension, for accurately phenotyping AF dynamics. KEY POINTS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) maintenance is facilitated by small L-type Ca2+ current (ICaL ) and large inward rectifier K+ current (IK1 ) and Na+ /K+ pump. In severely remodelled left atrium, with low voltage areas (LVA) covering more than 40% of the posterior wall, sustained AF requires higher IK1 and rotors localize in healthy right atrium. For lower LVA extensions, rotors can also anchor to LVA, if the atria present short refractoriness (low ICaL ) Vernakalant is effective in atria presenting long refractoriness (high ICaL ). For short refractoriness, atria with fast Na+ current (INa ) up-regulation respond more favourably to amiodarone than flecainide, and the opposite is found in atria with low INa . The inward currents (ICaL and INa ) are critical for optimal stratification of AF patient to pharmacological treatment and, together with the left atrial LVA extension, for accurately phenotyping AF dynamics.

The Effect of Time to Treatment With Antiarrhythmic Drugs on Survival and Neurological Outcomes in Shock Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

OBJECTIVES: Examining the association of time to treatment (drug or placebo) with survival to hospital discharge and neurologic outcome. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Amiodarone, Lidocaine, Placebo randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Emergency medical services enrolled patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) at multiple North American sites. PATIENTS: Adults with nontraumatic OHCA and an initial rhythm of ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia refractory to at least one defibrillation attempt were included. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We used logistic regression to examine the association of time to treatment with survival to hospital discharge and favorable neurologic status at discharge (modified Rankin Scale ≤ 3) for the three treatment groups including an interaction term between treatment and time to treatment to determine the effect of time on treatment effects. Time to treatment data were available for 2,994 out of 3,026 patients (99%). The proportion of patients who survived to hospital discharge decreased as time to drug administration increased, in amiodarone (odds ratio [OR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90-0.93 per min), lidocaine (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.91-0.96), and placebo (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90-0.93). Comparing amiodarone to placebo, there was improved survival at all times of drug administration (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.05-1.65). Comparing lidocaine to placebo, survival was not different with shorter times to drug administration (< 11 min), whereas survival was higher with lidocaine at longer times to drug administration with an interaction between treatment effect and time to treatment (p = 0.048). Survival with good neurologic outcome showed similar results for all analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Survival and favorable neurologic outcomes decreased with longer times to drug administration. Amiodarone improved survival at all time points whereas lidocaine improved survival only at later time points, compared with placebo.

Overview of the use of antiarrhythmic drugs at a tertiary hospital in Oman

Background: Antiarrhythmic drugs are commonly used to treat arrhythmia. However, data on the usage pattern of antiarrhythmic drugs, associated side effects, and the role of clinical pharmacist interventions in the Middle East are scarce. Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe the usage pattern, side effects, and clinical pharmacist interventions of antiarrhythmic drugs at the Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (SQUH), a tertiary care hospital in Oman. Methods: This retrospective observational study included adult patients (≥18 years) who received at least one dose of antiarrhythmic drugs at SQUH between January 2020 and December 2021. Ethical approval was obtained prior to conducting the study. Results: In total, 400 patients were enrolled in this study. Their mean age was 62.5 ± 16.6 years (range:19-96), and 55.3% (221/400) were male. Atrial arrhythmias were the most commonly observed (344/400, 86.0%). Beta-blockers (337/500, 67.4%) were the most prescribed class of drugs. The most commonly prescribed drugs were bisoprolol (263/400, 65.8%), carvedilol (65/400, 16.3%), and amiodarone (59/400, 14.8%). The majority of patients (300/400, 75.0%) received monotherapy, whereas 25% (100/400) received combination therapy. A total of 109 side effects were reported in 45 patients, resulting in an incidence rate of 11.3 %, with cardiovascular side effects accounting for the majority (41/109, 37.6%) of these. Amiodarone had the highest prevalence of adverse effects (33/109, 30.3%). A total of 122 clinical pharmacist interventions were observed in 13.0 % (52/400) of patients. Beta-blockers were associated with more than half of the interventions (61/122, 50.0%). (AU)

Mortality associated with antiarrhythmic medication for atrial fibrillation among patients with left ventricular hypertrophy.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines recommend amiodarone as the preferred antiarrhythmic medication (AAM) in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), due to potential pro-arrhythmic risk with other AAM. However, there are limited data to support this assertion. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 8204 patients who were prescribed AAM for AF and had transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) at the multicenter, VA Midwest Health Care Network from 2000 to 2021. We excluded patients without LVH (septal or posterior wall dimension ≤1.4 cm). The primary outcome variable was all-cause mortality during antiarrhythmic therapy or within 6 months after stopping it. Propensity-stratified analyses were performed between amiodarone versus non-amiodarone (Vaughan-Williams Class I and III) AAM. RESULTS: A total of 1277 patients with LVH (mean age 70.2 ± 9.5 years) were included in the analysis. Of these, 774 (60.6%) were prescribed amiodarone. Baseline characteristics of the two comparison groups were similar after propensity adjustment. After a median 1.40 years of follow-up, 203 (15.9%) patients died. Incidence rates per 100 patient-year follow-up was 9.02 (7.58-10.66) for amiodarone and 4.98 (3.91-62.56) for non-amiodarone. In propensity-stratified analysis, amiodarone use was associated with 1.58 times higher risk of mortality (95% CI 1.03-2.44; p = .038). Sub-group analysis in 336 (26.3%) patients with severe LVH showed no difference in mortality (HR 1.41, 95% CI 0.82-2.43, p = .21). CONCLUSION: Among patients with AF and LVH, amiodarone was associated with a significantly higher mortality risk than other AAM.

Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Efficacy of Antiarrhythmics in the Pharmacological Cardioversion of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.

PURPOSE: Since atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the major arrhythmias managed in hospitals worldwide, it has a major impact on public health. The guidelines agree on the desirability of cardioverting paroxysmal AF episodes. This meta-analysis aims to answer the question of which antiarrhythmic agent is most effective in cardioverting a paroxysmal AF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis, searching MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL, were performed, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enrolling a population of unselected adult patients with a paroxysmal AF that compared at least two pharmacological regimes to restore the sinus rhythm or a cardioversion agent against a placebo. The main outcome was efficacy in restoring sinus rhythm. RESULTS: Sixty-one RCTs (7988 patients) were included in the quantitative analysis [deviance information criterion (DIC) 272.57; I2 = 3%]. Compared with the placebo, the association verapamil-quinidine shows the highest SUCRA rank score (87%), followed by antazoline (86%), vernakalant (85%), tedisamil at high dose (i.e., 0.6 mg/kg; 80%), amiodarone-ranolazine (80%), lidocaine (78%), dofetilide (77%), and intravenous flecainide (71%). Taking into account the degree of evidence of each individual comparison between pharmacological agents, we have drawn up a ranking of pharmacological agents from the most effective to the least effective. CONCLUSIONS: In comparing the antiarrhythmic agents used to restore sinus rhythm in the case of paroxysmal AF, vernakalant, amiodarone-ranolazine, flecainide, and ibutilide are the most effective medications. The verapamil-quinidine combination seems promising, though few RCTs have studied it. The incidence of side effects must be taken into account in the choice of antiarrhythmic in clinical practice. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: International prospective register of systematic reviews, 2022, CRD42022369433 (Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022369433 ).

Effectiveness of pharmacological cardioversion of new-onset atrial fibrillation during thoracic surgery operations: a single-centre experience.

OBJECTIVE: Prophylactic pharmacological conversion agents could reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients undergoing thoracic operations. The current study examined whether the use of pharmacological conversion agents could help to restore sinus rhythm in patients with AF newly developed during thoracic operations. METHODS: Medical records of 18,605 patients from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2019, at the Shanghai Chest Hospital were reviewed. Patients with non-sinus rhythm prior to the surgery (n = 128) were excluded from data analysis. The final analysis included 18,477 patients (n = 16,292 undergoing lung operations; n = 2,185 undergoing esophageal operations). RESULTS: Intraoperative AF (defined as AF lasting for at least 5 min) occurred in 646 out of a total of 18,477 subjects (3.49%). Within the 646 subjects, 258 received pharmacological conversion agents during the surgery. sinus rhythm was restored in 20.15% (52/248) of patients treated with pharmacological cardioversion and in 20.87% (81/399) patients not receiving pharmacological intervention. In a subgroup analysis of the 258 patients receiving pharmacological conversion agents, recovery of sinus rhythm was highest in beta-blocker group (35.59%, 21/59 vs. 15.78%, 15/95 in amiodarone group, p = 0.008, 5.55%, and 1/18 in amiodarone plus beta-blockers group, p = 0.016). The incidence of hypotension was higher in pharmacological conversion (27.5% vs. 9.3% in patients not receiving pharmacological intervention, p < 0.001). In subjects not recovering to sinus rhythm during the surgery (n = 513), electrical cardioversion in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) restored sinus rhythm in > 98% of the cases (155/158 vs. 63/355 in subjects not receiving cardioversion; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that pharmacological conversion, in general, failed to show better treatment effectiveness on intraoperative new-onset AF within period of surgery except for beta-blockers. Patients with AF persisting beyond the surgery could be effectively managed with electrical cardioversion.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of potassium chloride in the management of out-of hospital cardiac arrest by refractory ventricular fibrillation: Study protocol of the POTACREH study.

PURPOSE: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has a poor prognosis, with an overall survival rate of about 5% at discharge. Shockable rhythm cardiac arrests (ventricular fibrillation (VF) and pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT)) have a better prognosis. In case of shockable rhythm, treatment is based on defibrillation, and thereafter, in case of failure of 3 external electric shocks (EES), on direct intravenous administration of 300 mg amiodarone, or lidocaine when amiodarone is unavailable or inefficient. During surgical procedures under extracorporeal circulation, a high potassium cardioplegia solution is administered to interrupt cardiac activity and facilitate surgical procedure. By extension, direct intravenous administration of potassium chloride (KCl) has been shown to convert VF, resulting in return to a hemodynamically efficient organized heart rate within a few minutes. The aim of this study is to provide clinical evidence that direct intravenous injection of KCl, into a patient presenting with OHCA due to refractory VF although 3 EES, should interrupt this VF and then allow rapid restauration of an organized heart rhythm, and thus return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). METHODS: A multicenter, prospective, single group, phase 2 study will be conducted on 81 patients presenting with refractory VF. After failure of 3 EES, each patient will receive direct intravenous injection of 20 mmol KCl instead of amiodarone. The primary outcome will be survival rate at hospital admission. Major secondary outcomes will include ROSC and time to ROSC in the prehospital setting, number of VF recidivism after KCl injection, survival rate at hospital discharge with a good neurologic prognostic, and survival rate 3 months after hospital discharge with a good neurologic prognostic. RESULTS: No patient is currently included in the study. DISCUSSION: Conventional guideline strategy based on antiarrhythmic drug administration, i.e. amiodarone or lidocaine, for OHCA due to shockable rhythm, has not yet demonstrated an increase in survival at hospital admission or at hospital discharge. This may be related to the major cardiodepressant effect of those drugs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04316611. Registered on March 2020. AP-HP180577 / N° EUDRACT: 2019-002544-24. Funded by the French Health Ministry. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04316611.